Book Name :
Islam: A Concise Introduction
Author
: Dr Neil Robinson
Pages
: 196
Price
: 15 pounds (UK)
Publisher
: The Curzon Press, Surrey, UK
I once heard a wise man say: ‘You see
what you want to see’. It is in this light that I distinguish between the
unalterable truth from the oft faltering opinions. It is like the fable
of the elephant and the blind men. Each man trying to grasp the reality
of the elephant, sees only the part that is limited to him by his environment,
prejudices and beliefs. As a corollary then intellectual efforts in books
should be carefully preened, treating the exposition as one of the many
possible in a parallel fashion. This is why writing an introductory book
in the social sciences can be quite difficult if the objective be to draw
the elephant rather than any of its parts. A professor of mine once said
that Orientalists mix the bad with the good, so that gradually as one appreciates
the honesty of the writer for depicting the truth, one tends more or less
to accept subconsciously his/her prejudiced statements as well.
The book under review is entitled
‘Islam: A Concise Introduction’ by an Orientalist Professor Neal
Robinson. Hence a principal focus of this review would be whether the book
under scrutiny is free from the above vice or not. One must also note that
the review would be from the glasses of a Muslim reader.
With the increase in frequency and
intensity of interaction between diverse people, each side has always felt
a need to shatter past ideas about the other. Such is true of the two rival
groups differentiated as Muslims and Christians. One can discern the trend
in Western writers of presenting Islam sympathetically in the person of
Lapidus, Watt, Schimmel and our book’s author, Dr. Robinson amongst many
others. This trend has been progressive from the Saracen days to Napoleon’s
conquest of Egypt to today’s West with a sizable Muslim population.
We would not learn much by knowing
that the author is a senior lecturer at the University of Leeds or that
he has written many books and articles. Hence we will focus on what would
be most beneficial to our understanding of his book. As manifest in the
book, Dr. Robinson’s interest widely range from Qur’anic studies,
classical Tafsir, rhetorical analysis of Hadith to Muslim-Christian
relations, Islam in France and Ibn ‘Arabi. The shift from the third
to the first person, the subtle points made on the translations of the
Qur’an and use of Islahi’s work speak of the author’s seriousness
of the first three areas. The historical trends outlined, the connections
highlighted between Muslim, Christian and Jewish practices, the comments
made on the modern society tell us about his in depth knowledge and grasp
on the latter subjects and his association with Muslims.
Dr. Robinson lists three reasons for
writing this book: He wants to discuss the problems raised by the Western
perceptions of Islam, provide a brief history of Islam and above all give
a sympathetic description of Islam as a faith. My only conjecture as to
the underlying reason beneath all this is that perhaps he wants to bridge
the gap between two civilizations through dedicated scholarship. The choice
of the green cover and the fragment of pattern perhaps seems to allude
to this.
Given the purpose, one can observe
that the book is structured in a manner that first one is supposed to gain
the perspective through history, then one is introduced to the fundamentals
of the faith before the law schools and various sects are introduced. Hence
one quality of the book is that it sequentially introduces the subject
to the non-Muslim or uninitiated reader; first trying to shatter pre-conceived
notions, then by drawing linkages between the three principal religions
and then bringing up the controversial matters of law so exaggerated in
the West.
One must however note that as the
book is of introductory nature much of it is descriptive. However, at many
a place the author’s opinions and speculation do show up making it an integrated
whole. Following the author’s structure, we can divide the book into three
sections and deal with them accordingly.
Section I
As observed above, the first section
deals with the development of perspective through history and more importantly
with the shattering of preconceived notions. It also deals with the current
geo political scene and events that have appalled the West thereby causing
the misrepresentation of Islam. Iran, Afghanistan, Sudan and Saudi Arabia
seem to be the prominent sites for this. Having outlined the glaring stories
of the past centuries, the author then sheds light on Muslim history right
from the founder’s days through the glorious Ommayid, Abbasid and Ottoman
dynasties, carefully outlining the trends in history. The dissection of
the whole era into well defined periods focusing on rise, reform and decline
of the Muslim Empire makes it easier to put various movements in their
right time. The use of the chart on p. 32 makes the substance easier to
digest.
However the significant portions in
this section are those that deal with the history of Oriental work and
the problems in understanding Islam especially so by the secularists. It
is for reasons mentioned in these sections that a small chapter is devoted
to defining Islam and later on distinction is made between Islam and Islamism.
This section is the one that principally deals with the presentation of
Islam sympathetically. An important point to note is the choice of words
for instance on p. 17 instead of using the commonplace ‘fled’, which many
writers and encyclopaedias use, the word ‘emigrated’ has been used for
the ‘Hijrah’. It must be noted that the interplay of words can be very
crucial in the subconscious absorption of any subject which then forms
part of our stance on the issue under consideration.
However the significant theme employed
has been the dissection between political and religious reasons throughout
the history traced by Islam. This is evident from his following words stated
in bold:
---Islam did not extend solely by military conquest.1
The main point remains that the rise and
fall of the dynasties or political edicts had more to do with politics
and power rather than religion and beliefs, which nonetheless were employed
in the justification of exploits but the primary cause was elsewhere. His
theme becomes strong towards the end when a distinction is made between
Nationalism and Radicalism on the one hand and Islam on the other. Differentiation
is also attempted between various Islamic groups including the governments
which makes the reader sift clearly the causes beneath the current Islamic
fanaticism.
Another important point to note is the shift from writers
like Bernard Lewis, no matter how sympathetic they claim to be, but who
bitterly criticize the Jizya system being unfair and relate it to
discrimination. One can observe the opposite in this book:
-- tax known as Jizya -- proved remarkably successful
in promoting religious tolerance.2
Moreover the distinction made of the ‘Tablighi
Jama‘at’, perhaps in the line of Barbara Metcalf, from the other movements,
apart from other observations made above, all seem to state that the author
remains sincere in his efforts in the objective description of Islam. However
it is one thing to provide a sympathetic description of history and altogether
different to do the same for the system of beliefs. For that would mean
accreditation of religion in the opposing force. This would take us to
section II.
Section II
This part deals with the fundamentals
of Islam that is One God, the Book, the Prophet and the five pillars. The
part on the Qur’an deals with various issues. Of interest to us
are the sections of coherence and translation, where one can notice the
influence of the Islahi school of thought. It would be interesting to note
that the writer places Noldeke’s work and Arberry’s translation above Egyptian
scholars and Yousaf Ali’s rendering. He does make a strong case especially
for Arberry. Biased or not, his work appears to have been sincerely concerted;
however lack of knowledge can make the exposition prejudiced.
Many would disagree on the part on
the preservation of the Qur’an or the seven readings but it would
be indeed marvellous to note how careful a presentation of the Qur’anic
structure has been made. This can be noted from his own words:
--- that the Qur’an is a highly poetic book which
seeks to transform the human consciousness by opening up the reader’s horizons
rather than to confine him to a mental strait-jacket. p.67.3
It is interesting to note that it is here
that the author shifts to using the first person ‘I’ indicating a sign
of interest and authority:
As far as I am concerned, whether or not these traditions
are reliable remains an open question.4
This is indicative of doubt when one falls
in the region where one seems to have exhausted all reason and one’s subconscious
takes on from here.
Another interesting point raised,
though not delved at any length, is that of the applicability of the divine
message for all times to come. Dr. Robinson asks several questions and
speculates much as well. However, one should wonder how far can the same
tools of analysis used in the social sciences be applicable in matters
of divine guidance.
We can also discern the strong association
with Sufism that is present in various pockets of the book. The mention
of Ibn Ishaq, Barelwi Litany and the evolution of Sufism all seem
to indicate this. One must note the use of words
-- Rabia of Basra, the celebrated woman mystic to whom
we owe the following beautiful prayer ---.5
This supports our earlier observation
that the choice of words has been definitely such that exhibits a sympathetic
attitude. The part on the alleged moral failings of the Prophet (sws) also
tells us that sufficient points have been raised to view his character
objectively as had already been done by Watt and some others. However some
basic points in the so called defence are missed out for instance questions
like: ‘How does one resolve the immense kindness (pardon even to Hinda)
with the massacre of the Banu Quraydah?’
Having dealt with God, his Book and
his Prophet (sws), Dr. Robinson neatly presents the pillars of Islam. The
structure followed discussing each pillar is uniform starting of with the
description followed by origins and purpose and finally the manifestation
in the modern world. Interesting are his use of etymological derivations
which delineate the connections between Muslim, Christian and Jewish practices.
The theme outlined is that Muslim practices have been borrowed and amended
from the previous religions. My immediate response can only be as follows:
It is great to speculate and draw connections; however, one must always
bear it at the back of one’s mind that ‘association does not imply causation’.
This is true so in history when many events take place simultaneously and
the direction of the trend can be seen in different ways. This ties
up with what was said earlier ‘You see what you want to see’. Likewise
a Muslim can claim that the deviant practices were simply brought back
to the states of perfection through a gradual well defined process.
While discussing each pillar, the
author assumes the position of a social commentator as well depicting the
current situation in the modern Muslim world. Dr. Robinson does raise some
questions which he feels perturbed by in the form of comments. This is
where this section is different in the sympathetic part to the other two.
If it is to be an introductory book then either these opinions have no
place in it or they be dealt properly with. This might not leave a pleasant
effect especially on the uninitiated audience. It must be noted that no
mention of the controversial subject ‘Jihad’ has been made perhaps
to maintain the sympathetic tempo of the book. However this tempo goes
away when prayers and even Hajj are connected with battlefield practices
and the comment just inserted without any explanation. For instance Dr.
Robinson says:
It is thus hard to escape the conclusion that discipline
in the mosque was originally intended to ensure discipline on the battlefield.6
Section III
Content wise this section is distinct
but there is not much to say about it. Here Dr. Robinson principally deals
with the description of the four schools of thought and of Muslim sects
in general. The use of chart on p. 166 shows a simple and interesting picture
of the formation of various sects and empires. However, the most important
rendering has been the section on Islamic Punishments: ‘Hudud’.
It is here that a strong defence has been mounted against Western perceptions
of Islamic punishments being barbaric.
However, Dr. Robinson does err in
the use of facts for instance on p. 172 the founder of Ahmaddiya is described
as an incarnation of Krishna which is not true. Likewise, earlier in the
history part, he describes Tamerlane from one angle only:
Despite the fact that he was a Muslim, his barbarity
matched that of the pagan Chinggis.7
The other aspect of Tamerlane’s patronizing
of the arts is totally neglected and hence once again the elephant is not
seen in whole. Nonetheless, the use of words in the above statement do
show his sympathetic attitude towards Islam. However as mentioned before
lack of knowledge leads to a biased reading.
Conclusion
Having read the book one can form
two opinions of the author. Either in the garb of sympathy on history and
on controversial issues, he cleverly and subtly attacks the foundations
of Islam ie. the pillars (one has already noticed the difference in style
in section II), or on the other hand perhaps he may not know the whole
picture and hence his views are colored by the little he knows.
However, on still closer examination, I find that his
choice of words, the use of pronouns, his acceptance of doubt in confusing
issues, the clear dissecting thoughts, the element of respect in the accent,
the use of ‘perhaps’ in speculation all seem to indicate that we can absolve
him from the former view point. Hence, he is not one of those who mix the
good and the bad. His interesting well concerted piece should tell Muslims
about their past in an objective light beyond romanticism and that how
can Muslim practices be seen linked with Christianity and Judaism, thereby
leading to an atmosphere of mutual tolerance. However, above all it tells
modern Muslims that their actions may not be in conformity to the true
principles of Islam.
I have found the book a pleasure to
read, illuminating the mind and broadening the knowledge base. I strongly
invite you to read it and discover how outsiders can at times present a
beautiful exposition on the splendour and magnificence of Islam.
|