Response: This question is
in reference to one of your replies. You said that Allah's name must necessarily
be taken before slaughtering animals and that the lack of pronouncing any
other name does not fulfil the requirement of slaughtering. However, the
Qur’anic verse that you quoted
does not seem to make the requirement for saying Allah's name before slaughtering:
Could not this possibly mean that a person
must say Allah's name before he begins to eat food?
Also how is a person supposed to make
sure that the food he eats is actually halal?
Are we to watch the slaughtering of every specific animal that we consume?
Furthermore, I am a bit confused as
to the conclusions you draw concerning the food of the People of the Book.
If the slaughtering done by the People of the Book is conditional on requirements
of sacrifice which are from Muslims, then how can it be the meat of the
People of the Book? Naturally, I would assume that the distinction between
Muslim slaughter and that of the People of the Book would be different
in order for that distinction to be made.
Comment: 1. If the context
of 6:121 is taken into consideration, the interpretation you have suggested,
I am afraid, cannot be made. Consider the previous verses:
So eat that on which Allah's name has been pronounced
if you have faith in His signs. Why should not you eat of that on which
Allah's name has been pronounced. He has explained to you in detail what
is prohibited to you except under some compulsion ... (6:119)
The last sentence of this verse clearly
shows that the food (meat) which is under discussion is that which is forbidden
because Allah's name has not been taken while slaughtering the animal from
which it was obtained. Taking Allah's name before starting to eat one's
food is not implied here at all. Furthermore, if the usage of the Qur’an in this regard is taken into consideration no other interpretation
is possible as well. (See for example 5:4, 22:28, 22:34, 22:36.)
2. Of course! we do not have to watch
the slaughtering of an animal. Just the information is enough -- which
of course is sometimes so obvious that there is no need even to ask and
at other times one can easily ask as to how the animal was slaughtered.
This obviously is a requirement only in non-Muslim countries where there
exists a doubt.
3. The distinction is made because
by the Qur’an because at that
time there were some people who used to believe that since the People of
the Book were not Muslims, eating their food was a forbidden thing. The
Qur’an is merely dispelling
this misconception and clarifying that if they take Allah's name in sacrificing
an animal then its meat can be eaten from their tables even if they have
not accepted Islam.
|