Question: One often comes across
people especially in Pakistan and India using the term Makruh while
talking about certain foods. We are aware of Halal (i.e. allowed
for consumption) and Haram (i.e. forbidden) foods but there seems
to be a lot of confusion about Makruh foods. I have been told that
such foods are not Haram but fall in the category about which we
are doubtful. It is also said that we are recommended to avoid them. Please
explain this in the light of the Qur’an and the Hadith.
Answer: The term Makruh
does not belong to the basic religious sources of the Shari‘ah rather
it has been coined by some juristic schools of thought. Some of the jurists
believe that if a weak tradition ascribed to the Holy Prophet (sws) renders
something forbidden then it is Makruh. We understand that the Shari‘ah
prohibits only four things which include flesh of swine, carrion, poured
out blood and animals consecrated in the name of deities other than God.
This is what we find in the Shari‘ah regarding Halal and
Haram foods. As far as other foods are concerned, humans innately
know what they should eat and what they should not. They, by virtue of
the innate guidance provided to them, are aware of the fact that certain
things are edible and others are not. The Holy Qur’an also tacitly
approves of this distinction and refers to this innate guidance bestowed
on man where it says that men should eat Tayyibat (i.e. the pure
things) (Qur’an, 5:4). It has implicitly informed us that this distinction
between the pure and the impure among the edibles is inherently known to
man.
The traditions ascribed to the Holy
Prophet (sws) in this regard refer to this innate knowledge of human beings.
The jurists took them as independent directives and classified the traditions
according to the degree of reliability as sound and weak. The things which
they came to know about through less authentic traditions they classified
as Makruh. However, it is clear from the foregoing paragraphs that
these traditions mostly make use of the innate guidance of man regarding
edibles and therefore should be understood on this basis.
|